Analytical paper

Carbon trading: helping or hindering global climate action?

05.11.2025, Climate justice

At the climate conference in Baku a year ago, the international community adopted new rules on the trade of Internationally Transferred Mitigation Outcomes (ITMOs) between countries. Some countries are hoping to attract investments, others are using ITMOs to achieve their nationally determined contributions. Taking the example of Switzerland, Alliance Sud and Fastenaktion question whether Article 6 of the Paris Agreement, which regulates ITMO trading, is really leading to more climate action.

Delia Berner
Delia Berner

Expert on international climate policy

Carbon trading: helping or hindering global climate action?

A wrong turn or fast track to energy transition: Switzerland is offsetting CO2 emissions cheaply abroad and continuing as before with domestic transport and consumption. © KEYSTONE/Gian Ehrenzeller

Switzerland considers itself a pioneer under the Paris Agreement which, 10 years ago, was widely hailed as a breakthrough in international climate policy. The Swiss Confederation was the quickest to implement Article 6, under which countries may trade in ITMOs in order to achieve their climate goals: the first bilateral agreements have been concluded, first projects approved, and the first ITMOs have been bought. On paper, Switzerland can achieve its climate targets by purchasing ITMOs despite only a negligible decline in Swiss greenhouse gas emissions. In exchange, climate action projects are being implemented in the Global South – e.g., by selling efficient cooking stoves, and promoting e-buses and e-bikes; the resulting emission reductions are then attributed to Switzerland. What does this trade in ITMOs mean for global climate action? Criticism of carbon offset projects is often countered with the assertion that they are expressly contemplated in the Paris Agreement. This is true on the sole condition that, overall, the trade in ITMOs generates more, not less climate action.

The experts from Alliance Sud and Fastenaktion investigated and analysed just how far Switzerland meets this condition as a pioneer of the Article 6 mechanism and unearthed a surprising number of puzzle pieces relevant to answering this question.
 

Publication

The New Deal – A New Switzerland for a Just World

06.07.2025, Financing for development

Climate change, war, poverty – we are experiencing the most serious crisis since the Second World War. But multilateral solutions seem a long way off at present. In its publication ‘The new deal’ Alliance Sud identifies reforms that show that Switzerland can afford to make a strong commitment to a more peaceful and just world and where it needs to invest to achieve this. Because the money is there. Alliance Sud not only shows the price tag, but also how the bill can be paid.

The New Deal – A New Switzerland for a Just World

If Switzerland is to live less at the expense of the Global South in the future, it must, among other things, phase out its low-tax and offshore banking strategy. Banking district in Geneva. Photo: Mark Henley/Panos Pictures

Study

Impact Investing and Sustainable Development

10.12.2024, Financing for development

Impact Investment has gained popularity, particularly in Switzerland, a country known for its financial system and its aspirations for sustainable finance. As impact investing is often presented as a panacea for development challenges, Alliance Sud’s study takes a critical look at its effectiveness, its limitations and the extent to which it can contribute to sustainable development.

Laurent Matile
Laurent Matile

Expert on Enterprises and Development

Impact Investing and Sustainable Development

Impact investing, while growing, remains a niche market globally,
particularly in developing countries. Source: Tameo 2023.

Publication

The upcoming referendum on corporate tax reform

22.01.2019, Finance and tax policy

On 19 May, Switzerland votes again on its corporate tax reform, which Parliament has linked to additional funding of its pension system (AHV). From a development policy point of view, the tax proposal does not represent any significant progress.

Dominik Gross
Dominik Gross

Expert on finance and tax policy

The upcoming referendum on corporate tax reform

The linking by Parliament of two not related subjects - corporate taxation and AHV financing - is widely referred to as horse-trading. (in German: cow-trading)
© Pixabay

After the 50‘000 necessary signatures for a referendum against the STAF (Steuervorlage und AHV-Finanzierung) have been submitted, the Swiss voters will again decide on the pending corporate tax reform. Alliance Sud's tax policy analysis (available in German only) shows that, from a development perspective, the proposal does not represent any significant progress compared with Corporate Tax Reform III (USR III), which was rejected two years ago. Once again, the old special tax regimes that are detrimental to development are to be replaced by new ones.

The current proposal would bring Swiss corporate taxation into an internationally accepted form and finally abolish the old special tax regimes exclusively for foreign group profits taxed in Switzerland. This is very welcome from a development point of view. At the same time, however, it creates new opportunities for multinational corporations to shift profits. By shifting profits to low tax jurisdictions such as Switzerland, multinationals are depriving developing countries of an estimated 200 billion dollars of potential tax base every year.

Alliance Sud's detailed analysis of new tax dumping vehicle within the STAF shows that the envisaged new Swiss corporate tax policy is not compatible with the goals for sustainable development set out in the UN Agenda 2030 (Sustainable Development Goals SDG). As the country with the highest per capita density of headquarters of multinational corporations, Switzerland has a special responsibility in the fight against global social inequality and for adequate financing of Agenda 2030.

Due to the tax dumping of low-tax jurisdictions such as Switzerland, corporate taxation has been falling worldwide for decades. This prevents the most urgent public provision of health, education and infrastructure services to disadvantaged population groups in developing countries. Switzerland is not a freerider on the train that is pulling global corporate taxation into the abyss - it is rather one of the locomotives and will remain so with the STAF.

Despite the considerable shortcomings in the tax section of the bill, Alliance Sud refrains from a voting recommendation. The AHV part of the bill concerns a domestic policy issue that goes beyond the organization's development policy mandate. At the same time, the Alliance Sud members have different views on the question of the extent to which a developmentally just corporate tax reform is also possible beyond the current proposal. It is clear that such a reform remains necessary regardless of the result of the May vote.